Saturday, December 19, 2009
BE Confusion
I still have no idea what an engineer is. To me, BE means combining many different aspects of science to create devices that will help doctors keep people healthier and make the quality of life better. Specifically, using stem cells to create organs. But I was talking to a fellow BE freshman and to him, it meant something completely different.
Which is right? I guess neither. The definition must be abstract and individualized. Which leads me to my confused question: what will the final really be asking? If this course really means something different to everyone, how can we answer questions for the general?
AGHH so much confusion. Where do I start for this final?
Friday, December 11, 2009
Who knew it went so fast?
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
What Has Been Going On... Everything but BE
I'm having mixed feeling about the cold. I loved seeing it snow (first time!) and I don't mind the cold if I'm layered correctly, but I'm not such a fan of being outside when it snows. The snow lands on your face and melts, freezing your face and any other exposed body surface. I think I like warm areas better, but since I chose this school, I'm gonna have to get used to cold winters.
I have started studying for finals (which are in a week! aghhh) Its A LOT of information. I'm sorta surprised that i learned all this in only one semester. But now i have to just sit down and do all the problems that I have been assigned. that's the problem. I haven't been doing that. So I'm making a finals resolution: Stop procrastinating and do your work! Now, if only I could follow that.
Monday, November 30, 2009
No Monkey Business for Us
I'm still a little confused what we need at the end besides a poster, but hopefully when I meet with team monkey tomorrow, we'll give out the final parts.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Idea 8: Is this the magic number?
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
PCA-Oral Version
One of the biggest issues we are having is controlling safety, which has caused us to scrap a few ideas already. After all, its not so safe to be dispensing painkillers with no safety features.
I hope we can make this work out ok!
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Was it really around that long ago?
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Blood Clotting-A Dual Process
Monday, October 19, 2009
Blood Clots: Finding Sources and The Basic Overview
I finally settled on platelet receptors and their role in blood clot formation. (I hope this follows through because the thought of changing my topic now is daunting)
Sources:
Integrins: Dynamic Scaffolds for Adhesion and Signaling In Platelets
The Contribution of the Three Hypothesized Integrin-Binding Sited In Fibrinogen to Platelet-Mediated Clot Retraction
GPIIb-IIIa: The Responsive Integrin
Structural basis For Allostery In Integrins And Binding To Fibrinogen-Mimetic Therapeutics
Platelet Physiology and Thrombosis
Platelet Receptors and Signaling In the dynamics of Thrombus Formation
Information:
After reading these sources, I have figured out the basic process of blood clotting through alphaIIbbeta3 receptors. A receptor is activated by an activator (ligand) and the receptor's morphology changes from being bent (inactive) to straight up (active). In its active form, a fibrinogen molecule can bind to the receptors on the platelets. Throbin, a protein in the blood that helps with thrombus formation, causes the fibrinogen to form insoluble fibrin fibers. Theses fibers are the web-like structure of the clot and hold the platelets, cells and other clotting factors in place so the clot can form.
I'm still researching how the integrin knows to activate the platelet. So far, I understand that when there is vascular injury, there is a chemical response, which triggers the integrins. What that chemical response and how that is triggered, I don't know yet.
Lets hope I can figure out the whole process!!
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Blood Clots-A Research Question
Initial Research: Blood cells (platelets) are required to repair a damaged blood vessel. They adhere to the site of vascular injury and connect to each other, forming a clot. While this action of platelet clotting is important for maintenance of our bodies, if a clot forms in the wrong location at the wrong time (i.e. in a heart artery) a heart attack or a stroke could occur. The idea is to stop blood clots from being created.
What is a blood clot? "Blood clotting, or coagulation, is an important process that prevents excessive bleeding when a blood vessel is injured." (http://www.bloodthevitalconnection.org/for-patients/blood-clots/Default.aspx.aspx) On a general level, the blood cells come together and attach to one another, creating a thrombus. At a closer level, it becomes evident that receptors on the platelet membrane become activated in the presence of fibrinogen and bind to the soluble glycoprotien, creating a web-like structure. This thrombus becomes so close together that it forms a wall like structure, not allowing anything to pass in or out of the blood vessel. It keeps the temperature, concentrations and materials of the blood vessel in the body. A scab can form on the outer layer of skin from the dried blood of the injury. This is another layer of protection.
While doing some reading, I came across the idea of blood thinners as a cure. There are many varieties out there (a small list-http://stroke.about.com/od/caregiverresources/a/blood_thinners.htm) and they generally work along the idea that thinning your blood keeps the platelets further from each other so that they don't clot. Before you go into major surgery, you stop taking the blood thinner so that you can clot normally and heal your injury. There are side effects to blood thinners, such as kidney issues, stomach ulcers and breathing issues, to make a few. So blood thinners are not the answer for everyone.
What I would now like to do is investigate another way of stopping platelet aggregation. Is there a machine? Is there another internal method?
Monday, October 5, 2009
Abstract Thinking 1: The Search For a Structure
As an assignment to learn how to figure out this abstract concept, we were told to find a structure on campus and describe it in three lengths. What? What does that mean? That’s what I’ve spent the last week trying to decipher.
I wanted my structure to be different than everyone else’s. It’s sort of boring to have the same thing as someone else. So I first tried to think out of the box. There are two aspects to this type of thinking. It could either be totally obscure that no one else would think of it, or it has to be totally normal, right in front of your eyes that everyone else would just glance right by. I attempted the first type because that is ultimately the cooler and more interesting type. But I was unsuccessful with that. I could think of strange structures, but measuring it in three lengths was a challenge. So I switched to the second type of out of the box thinking. I sat down on a bench in the quad outside my dorm and looked at everything in front of me.
I first noticed a tree. That’s not a structure. Then I saw the wall of the building itself. As easy as a building may be, I didn’t think it would be a challenge to describe in three lengths, hence no real expansion of abstract thinking. So I continued to look. After focusing on a few other structures and throwing them out for various reasons, I focused on a bike rack. Its structure is so simple, yet so hard to describe and measure. So I have finally found my structure: I will be using a bike rack.
Now on to measurements. Are the three lengths supposed to be in cm, area and volume? Or is it a structural measurement? Or a functional measurement? A combination of all three? So confusing.
Wish me luck, because I’m a little lost about how to go about my measurements and descriptions.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Technology and Cost: An Inverse Relationship
When one goes up, the other goes down. A rise in technology almost always brings about a fall in cost. With new materials and processes constantly being developed by scientists, the costs of old methods decrease exponentially. A computer chip used to cost a fortune, but now they can be developed for as little as a cent. With the invention of cheaper and more efficient medicines and methods for administering healthcare, the cost of healthcare will be reduced.
List of ways to reduce healthcare using technology:*
Medications
1.Using Solid State Chemistry to produce medications in large quantities in a safe, contained way
2.Using Soil to produce Antibodies as opposed to bacteria. The amount available is great; it just has to be researched.
3.Using synthetic materials in medications that are cheaper to produce
Patient-Doctor Relationship
4.Computerized surgery would decrease the cost of surgery (no doctor fees, only technician fees.)
5.Computerized, monitoring chips that could check your vital information, decreasing the time of doctor-patient interactions.
Administering Medications
6.Higher accuracy in treatments would decrease the amount of treatment needed
7.Use solid state chemistry crystals to administer medications in the right proportions at the right times
8.Administering drugs through pills as opposed to needles, which need a nurse to inject
9.Higher accuracy in treatments would decrease the amount of treatment needed, hence save money.
Overall Cheaper Practices
10.Using the human body as a store house for personal medications (i.e. causing your body to create the medications you need for your disease.)
11.Earlier detection methods (using blood, scent or DNA as a method of detection.)
*All these methods if decreasing healthcare costs would be expensive to implement and to initially produce, but overall, would decrease healthcare costs.
Monday, September 21, 2009
On My Own, Here I Go...
The one thing that I love about college above all else in regards to classes is the topics taught. In high school, you were required to take an English, a history, a math, a language and a science every day, among other things. But here, I only take classes that interest me (or are pre-requisites for classes that interest me) so I’m not bored.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Swine Flu and the Earth Shattering Question it Raises
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)[2] has recently approved a swine flu vaccine and the earth shattering question arises: Should I get the shot?
To answer this question, I did some research about the vaccine itself and the flu in general. The majority of people who die from swine flu are at high risk, meaning they have chronic medical issues.[1] I do not fall into this category. I am also not under 5 months, I am over 18 and I am not pregnant, making my risk factor much less.[1] All this points to the fact that I should not get the vaccine since it seems to be a waste of a shot.
However, the fact that I am part of a community seems to outweigh all the negative cons. As part of a community, immunizing me keeps the community healthier and on the flipside, being part of a community makes me more susceptible to the disease. So with this logic, I should get the vaccine. I may not be part of a high risk group, the my presence at UPenn places me in a high density population.[3]
The final step to consider is the risks of the vaccine itself. The H1N1 strain mutates rapidly and the vaccine they have created may not be effective against the new strain. If this is the case, there is no point in taking the vaccine, since it will be ineffective. Also, while the preliminary clinical trials say that the side effects are the same as those for the seasonal flu shot (fever, soreness, etc.)[2] there are no long term effect trials available.
Taking into account all these issues, I would not run out and get the shot at this moment. However, should the virus become more widespread at UPenn, I would not hesitate to get vaccinated.
A second question arises as to who should receive the vaccine if a limited amount of vaccine is available. The CDC reported that the vaccine should be given to “pregnant women, people who live with or care for children younger than 6 months of age, health care and emergency medical services personnel with direct patient contact, children 6 months through 4 years of age, and children 5 through 18 years of age who have chronic medical conditions” should there be a shortage.[1] The vaccine should be given to those at risk, for example, chronic illness patients, young children, and pregnant women.[3] By administering the shot directly to these groups of people, it directly saves lives. If you give it to healthy people, you may stop the spreading of the virus, but you never know if it was effective in stopping overall mortality.
References:
1. Center for Disease Control www.cdc.gov
2. Food and Drug Administration www.fda.gov
3. World Health Organization www.who.int/en
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
The Ultimate Package: Pain Relief and Healing
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Stem Cells Are a Bioengineers Best Friends
Can You Build A Body From Science?
Monday, September 14, 2009
Hold Up- New Classes, New Experiences
I’ve always loved working in labs. It was during my summers working in various labs that I became familiar with bioengineering research and techniques. Because I loved working with tissue engineering and stem cell development, I chose to major in bioengineering. I didn’t realize it came with an added writing requirement (this blog) but I’m hoping it will help with my overall writing abilities.